Re: On possibly "finer" dependencies in s6-rc

From: Casper Ti. Vector <caspervector_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 22:44:09 +0800

That would be much cleaner. Thanks :)

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:40:56PM +0000, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> Probably not. If anything, I'll think about the use of s6-svwait > oneshots
> a bit more, and if I assess it's the correct, or as correct as it gets,
> way to implement disjunctions, I'll add a mechanism in s6-rc-compile to
> encapsulate it and auto-generate hidden oneshot services - because
> those "utility" services should not be managed by users - they should
> be part of the magic instead.

-- 
My current OpenPGP key:
RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19)
7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C
Received on Tue May 02 2017 - 14:44:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC