Re: runit SIGPWR support

From: Jeff <sysinit_at_yandex.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:45:25 +0100

12.02.2020, 22:54, "Colin Booth" <colin_at_heliocat.net>:
> far as I know SIGPWR is a Linux-specific signal so services that are
> aiming for portability will either need to have special handling for
> that in the linux case or need to ignore it. Ergo, runit (and all other
> POSIX-compliant inits) currently have no special handling around SIGPWR
> as they don't understand what it is.

what about SIGINT and SIGWINCH ? are they required by the POSIX
standard ? if not why does runit handle both ?
Received on Mon Feb 17 2020 - 14:45:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC